The United States and the world · from August 1929 to the late 1930s
Source: Federal Reserve History, "The Great Depression" (Richardson); Richmond Fed Economic Brief 12-11 (unemployment 25.2%); FDIC, "A Brief History of Deposit Insurance" (about 9,000 banks, from autumn 1929 to the end of 1933). The original pages were blocked in the working environment, so they were checked through search-result excerpts.
Source: Federal Reserve History, "The Great Depression" (start in August 1929; money supply nearly 30%); FDIC (about 9,000 banks; insurance from 1 Jan 1934); Richmond Fed Economic Brief 12-11 (3.3% and 25.2%); SEC Historical Society (SEC, 1934); SSA (Social Security Act, 14 Aug 1935). Via search-result excerpts.
Why did a stock market fall and an ordinary recession stretch into a decade of hardship? Because how the world responded in the first three years mattered more than the first shock.
The answer is Mark's reading, based on Federal Reserve History and Friedman and Schwartz (1963). Economists still debate the causes: see Part 3 and Part 5.
Ten years, three banking panics, one relapse. Dates from Federal Reserve History and the FDIC.
Source: Federal Reserve History: "The Great Depression", "Stock Market Crash of 1929" (6%, 381.17, −13%, New York Fed response, 41.22), "Banking Panics of 1930–31" (11 Dec 1930), "Banking Panics of 1931–33" (21 Sep 1931, rate rise in early October 1931), "Bank Holiday of 1933", "Emergency Banking Act of 1933" (9 Mar 1933), "Recession of 1937–38"; FDIC (1,350 banks in 1930 from a Federal Reserve History essay cited with FDIC material; about 4,000 in 1933; $2,500; 9 failures in 1934); Marriner Eccles memo on FRASER (1.5% to 3.5%); Hsieh and Romer (2006), Journal of Economic History (about $1 billion in 1932); 24 Oct 1929 from History.com (secondary source); Executive Order 6102 and the Gold Reserve Act from Wikipedia and EBSCO (secondary sources); Banking Act of 16 Jun 1933 from Wikipedia and EBSCO (secondary sources); 1937–38 unemployment from Wikipedia (secondary source, series not stated).
Five decisions, seen with the eyes of the time: who decided, what they knew, what they chose, what happened next. Many choices followed the "rules of the game" of that era.
Source: Federal Reserve History, "Stock Market Crash of 1929" (via search-result excerpts).
Source: Federal Reserve History, "Banking Panics of 1930–31"; FDIC history page 1930–1939 (merger attempt, debate over solvency); Friedman and Schwartz (1963), via secondary summaries.
Source: Federal Reserve History, "Banking Panics of 1931–33"; FDIC history page 1930–1939 (9 Oct 1931); Marriner Eccles memo on FRASER (1.5% to 3.5%).
Source: Federal Reserve History, "Bank Holiday of 1933" and "Emergency Banking Act of 1933"; FDIC (9 failures in 1934); Executive Order 6102 and the Gold Reserve Act from Wikipedia and EBSCO (secondary sources).
Source: Federal Reserve History, "Recession of 1937–38"; Calomiris, Mason and Wheelock, NBER Working Paper 16688.
Money (Friedman and Schwartz, 1963): banking panics and the Fed letting the money stock shrink by about a third (1929–1933) were the main cause.
Spending (Temin, 1976): spending fell first; the 1930 panic was not a major deflationary shock.
The gold standard (Eichengreen, 1992; Temin, 1989): the rules of gold tied central banks' hands worldwide and carried the shock across borders.
The credit channel (Bernanke, 1983): collapsing banks cut the lending channel; falling prices made debts heavier.
Hsieh and Romer (2006) found that the $1 billion of purchases in 1932 led almost no one to expect a dollar devaluation, meaning gold did not bind the Fed as tightly as often thought, at least that year. A 1995 survey of economic historians (Whaples) showed they still disagree a lot about the causes. The closest thing to a consensus: an ordinary downturn made much worse by the Fed, the gold standard and the collapse of banking. There is no single settled answer.
Source: Friedman and Schwartz (1963); Temin (1976, 1989); Eichengreen (1992); Bernanke (1983); Hsieh and Romer (2006), Journal of Economic History 66(1); Whaples (1995), Journal of Economic History 55(1). Via summaries and excerpts; "a third" is Friedman and Schwartz's figure as quoted in secondary summaries.
Things we take for granted today were born in this decade.
Source: FDIC; SEC Historical Society (SEC 1934); SSA history pages (14 Aug 1935); Eichengreen and Sachs (1985), Journal of Economic History 45(4); Federal Reserve History, "Recession of 1937–38". 16 Jun 1933 from Wikipedia and EBSCO (secondary sources).
14 things often said about the Great Depression, checked against the Fed, FDIC, CDC and peer-reviewed research. Tap each line for the reason.
Dow Jones 381.17 (3 Sep 1929) down to 41.22 (8 Jul 1932), a fall of 89% (Mark's calculation). Federal Reserve History, "Stock Market Crash of 1929".
FDIC: from autumn 1929 to the end of 1933, depositors lost about $1.3 billion. Another FDIC publication counts "more than 9,000" up to the March 1933 bank holiday. State the time window when quoting it.
Federal Reserve History: nearly 30% from autumn 1930 to winter 1933, the Fed's most serious "sin of omission". Friedman and Schwartz: about a third, 1929–1933 (different window).
CDC (2011), Luo et al.: 18.0 (1928) up to 22.1 per 100,000 (1932), the highest ever recorded. The biggest rise was among working-age adults.
Eichengreen and Sachs (1985), Journal of Economic History: early devaluers had better industrial output and exports. Note: a single country's devaluation hurt its neighbours.
The Fed made big mistakes (Federal Reserve History says so itself), but there was also the gold standard (Eichengreen), a fall in spending (Temin), and the collapse of the credit channel (Bernanke 1983). No single settled answer (Whaples 1995).
The 2002 apology was a remark by Ben Bernanke, then one governor, at a celebration for Milton Friedman. Not a Fed resolution. The Fed's own Federal Reserve History site does say the Fed made errors.
The law came in 1930, after the downturn had begun; 1,028 economists signed a letter against it beforehand (5 May 1930, secondary source). Eichengreen (1986): small direct macro effect. Irwin (2011): it harmed world trade. A contributor, not the main cause.
The line "liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers" appears only in Hoover's memoirs (1951), with no independent source. Hoover presented it as the view of a camp he did not side with (secondary source).
Whaples survey (1995): about half of economists and 27% of historians agreed wholly or partly (via secondary sources). Researchers are split.
Friedman and Schwartz say yes. Calomiris, Mason and Wheelock (NBER) find the requirements did not bind banks, so the effect was small. Federal Reserve History gives both views.
The downturn began in August 1929, before the crash. The crash was a big shock, but the worst damage came later: three banking panics in 1930–1933 and policy decisions (Federal Reserve History; Friedman and Schwartz).
Manhattan: 44 suicides in the 4 weeks after the crash, fewer than 53 in the same period of 1928 (Norris, via History.com, secondary source). Galbraith called it a legend. There were a few real individual cases.
Federal Reserve History describes a series of national and international financial crises in 1931–1933. Britain left gold in September 1931; the shock travelled through the gold standard system (Eichengreen).
Source: as noted in each line; full list in Part 9.
Scores are Mark's assessment based on the sources in Part 9, not data from a study.
The 1929 shock was not the worst of it. The worst was three years of letting the spiral run, in the belief that the system would clean itself and the gold rule had to be kept at any cost.
In 1930 there was no theory of a lender of last resort for a system of thousands of small banks, no monthly unemployment data, and keeping gold was seen as duty. Raising rates in 1931 was by the book of the time.
But not everyone thought so: the New York Fed pumped in money in 1929 and wanted to do more; in 1932 the Fed did pump, then stopped on its own. Other choices were on the table, just not chosen.
Mark's commentary, based on Federal Reserve History and Hsieh and Romer (2006).
For any team facing a problem that is spreading: customers leaving, projects slipping in a chain, rumours inside the company.
1. At your last incident, how long did the team take from noticing to stopping the spread? What was most of that time spent on?
2. Does the team have a "gold standard": a rule nobody dares break even while it does harm?
3. Who is allowed to add people or money within 24 hours without waiting for a meeting?
4. The last time the team withdrew support from something it had just rescued, which number did it rely on?
5. If customers or colleagues are worried, what guarantee can the team state today?
Fed, FDIC, CDC and SSA documents and peer-reviewed research first. The working environment blocked the original sites, so these were checked through excerpts of those very pages in search results, without opening the full text. Secondary sources are marked.